Sign up for e-mail updates:

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home ›› Blog ›› Dust-Up Between Parks & Recreation and Fish & Game over ATVs

Dust-Up Between Parks & Recreation and Fish & Game over ATVs

Posted by John Robison at Jan 12, 2012 09:10 AM |

The legislature may weigh in on a turf war between Idaho Parks and Recreation and Idaho Fish and Game over Fish and Game's authority to restrict hunting from ATVs.

Dust-Up Between Parks & Recreation and Fish & Game over ATVs

Conflicts between hunters who use ATVs and those who don't are increasing. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service photo.

Two state agencies find their missions increasingly at odds with one another. One of the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation's duties is to promote access for motorized recreation. One of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game's goals is to protect high-quality hunting opportunities. However, conflicts between hunters who use ATVs and traditional hunters who don't are increasing

One management tool Fish and Game uses is restriction of motorized hunting access in sensitive areas. In addition to concerns about conflicts, studies have shown that increases in ATV use and the densities of motorized trails can negatively affect elk.

Fish and Game uses the Motorized Hunting Rule to prohibit hunters from using an ATV while actively hunting in one third of Idaho's hunting units (hunting on foot or using an ATV to set up camp is allowed). Since 1986, Fish and Game has had an agreement with the Forest Service allowing Fish and Game to enforce travel plan restrictions—efforts critical to managing expanding ATV use.

However, staff at Parks and Recreation (as well as the Idaho State ATV Association) have disagreed with the Motorized Hunting Rule, finding it to be confusing and difficult to enforce. Parks and Recreation did not include it in their OHV outreach materials and have advocated that rule be eliminated. The problem is that, without Parks and Rec's help to educate hunters and ATV riders, the rules are very confusing and even contradictory.

This all came to a head last year when the Idaho Legislature created an ATV Task Force to review this issue (see statements by each agency and a transcript of the committee meetings here). The Task Force asked the Attorney General's office to review the legality of the Motorized Hunting Rule. The AG's office determined that the Motorized Hunting Rule "conforms with legislative intent, but that the Legislature may wish to revisit these statutes to either expressly permit or prohibit the Commission rulemaking on this subject matter."

While Parks and Recreation and Fish and Game have declared a temporary truce, this issue is going to be a hot topic again this year. Fish and Game's Motorized Hunting Rule and their ability to enforce travel planning regulations on National Forests will be under fire. If you want to see wildlife managed responsibly, traditional hunting opportunities preserved and travel plans enforced, you may need to make your voice heard above the upcoming roar.


Document Actions

F&G ATv Rule

Posted by Mark Sauerwald at Feb 01, 2012 03:34 PM
This article doesn’t tell the entire story. It’s misleading when you say “Fish and Game uses the Motorized Hunting Rule to prohibit hunters from using an ATV while actively hunting”. What the F&G rule does is prohibit a “hunter” to travel on an ATV to a hunting area on a USFS or BLM trail that is OPEN for ATV travel. Now keep in mind, the USFS/BLM has not closed that trail. It is open to anyone EXCEPT a hunter trying to get to his/her hunting area. Also keep in mind, F&G is 100% evolved in every Travel Mgt plan process by USFS/BLM for all federal properties in ID. F&G has this rule as an “Ace in their pocket” just in case USFS/BLM don’t take their advice to close a trail to ATVs.

Additionally, F&G has a really bad habit of using the term “studies have shown” but seem to never have the data to backup the statement. The fact of the matter is one and one alone. Traditionalist are complaining about non-traditional things (use of ATVs vs horses, etc) and F&G officials are sympathetic to that group. This rule allows F&G to do whatever they please to close an area to any hunter by stating that XYZ is an aid to hunting, therefore we can regulate it and deny access to you. I.e. they have publicly stated because the camping exemption to the rule can be circumvented, they (F&G) can regulate camping as an aid to hunting if they so choose…..Seriously!!! And yes, they can deem horseback, your pickup truck, etc as an aid to hunting and impose rules that prohibit their use as well.

These are the facts. Next time you write an article perhaps you should get them all straight.

powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and served with clean energy