Sign up for e-mail updates:

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home ›› Blog ›› Federal Lands in State Hands?

Federal Lands in State Hands?

Posted by Jonathan Oppenheimer at Dec 20, 2012 09:00 AM |

Rep. Lawrence Denney is gearing up to try to seize control of Idaho's federal lands. From the remote Owyhee Canyonlands to the rugged breaks of the Salmon River to the snow-bound peaks of the Selkirks, Idaho's public lands are critical to Idaho's quality of life. Polls indicate that Idahoans support federal land management by a margin of 3:1. So why don't our leaders?

Federal Lands in State Hands?

If the state were to manage all federal lands, there would be no legal requirement to allow public access.

According to recent reports, former Speaker of the House Rep. Lawrence Denney is gearing up for an attempt to seize control of Idaho's federal lands. The effort comes on the heels of efforts in Arizona, Utah and elsewhere to wrest control of public lands from the federal government. Idaho is home to 33 million acres of federally managed lands (20 million acres of National Forests, 12 million acres managed by the Bureau of Land Management and 1 million acres managed by other federal agencies).

Idaho's leaders often suggest that Idahoans think our federal land management agencies are bumbling fools seeking to steal our freedoms.

Unfortunately, these suggestions appear wildly out of touch with reality. A recent Idaho poll—conducted by a well-respected Republican pollster—found:

  • 76% of Idahoans agree that "one of the things our federal government does well is protect and preserve our national heritage through the management of forests, national parks and other public lands."
  • 87% of Idahoans are "satisfied with the quality and quantity of outdoor recreational opportunities in Idaho."
  • 97% of Idahoans agree that "our public lands, including forests, national parks, monuments and wildlife areas are an essential part of Idaho's quality of life."

In North Central Idaho, a recent proposal to privatize up to 40,000 acres of the Nez Perce National Forest near Grangeville came under attack from local residents and concerned stakeholders alike. Similarly, proposals from the Bush Administration came under fire when national forests were proposed for privatization.

Proposals to seize federal lands have sprouted in other states, prompted by calls from an organization called the American Lands Council. Last year, the Utah Legislature passed a bill to initiate a process to turn over 30 million acres of federal land to the state. Recent reports from the Utah Commission, established by that law, indicate that such a move would siphon money from the state's coffers.

On election day this year, voters in Arizona rejected Prop 120, which would have turned over 25 million acres to the state. That initiative failed by a margin of 2:1.

The bottom line is that for all the fed-bashing that our leaders engage in, Idahoans cherish our public lands and don't want to see them auctioned off to the highest bidder.

Stay tuned to ICL over the course of the upcoming legislative session, and we'll make sure your voice is heard.


Document Actions

Not again!

Posted by Matt at Dec 21, 2012 08:15 AM
I'm from Idaho but moved to Salt lake City for grad school about a year ago and I have been frustrated to no end with this loony idea proposed by the state government here. I was hoping Idaho's leaders would have their heads on a little more strait but I guess not. This is a TERRIBLE idea in every conceivable way! I'm proud to be from a state that has so much of what other states lack: beautiful public lands! Let's keep it that way forever!

Fed. Lands

Posted by Erin at Jan 31, 2013 10:44 AM
Would the lands remain public? Could land be sold to private uses or developments if it was deemed to be the have the most economic gain? Would public access remain to all the lands that are already accessible?

Fed. Lands response

Posted by Jonathan Oppenheimer, ICL at Jan 31, 2013 11:12 AM
Erin-
Those are great questions. So far, we don't have answers, as we haven't seen any specific language yet, but according to the discussion at a recent joint hearing of the House and Senate Resources Committees, several legislators were quick to suggest the sale of public lands to generate revenue and reduce management costs.
If sold, the land would become private and access could be restricted, just like on any private lands. This is a major concern, but not the only one...
The proposal would contradict existing federal law and the Idaho Constitution, threaten clean water and wildlife habitat, and eliminate resource protections on millions of acres of our public lands...lands that belong to all of us.
Please contact your legislators TODAY to oppose this proposal.
http://www.idahoconservation.org/[…]/act-now-to-protect-public-lands
Thanks,
jonathan

public land

Posted by ray anderson at Feb 07, 2013 02:43 PM
Hello Jonathan,
Thank you for your letter published in the Idaho County Free Press.
Chemlik told me in November up to 20% of the new state land will need to be made private.I am sure that would just be the start.
Public land needs to remain public.This is our most important
legacy to our children and all future generations of Americans.
Ray Anderson Grangeville

Public lands

Posted by Roger at Feb 28, 2013 10:04 AM
Idaho politicians are pushing to gain control of public lands in Idaho, a move I hope never happens. They are stating that the state could better manage its own land for the benefit of Idaho residence. Go to Google earth and look at the state managed lands east of Priest Lake or the state managed Floodwood area between the St. Joe and Clearwater rivers. Better yet take a drive this summer and see the carnage for yourself in these areas. Its not a pretty site. Few people see the destruction in these areas or understand its the state of Idaho's management policies that are responsible for the plunder in these areas. I'm an Idaho native born and raised and employed by the timber industry and I see the need for logging, responsible and sustainable logging. I love the public lands of Idaho and the many beautiful and amazing recreational opportunities on Forest Service managed lands. It would be a huge mistake to allow these resources to be managed by the greed driven policies of the state of Idaho.










powered by Plone | site by Groundwire Consulting and served with clean energy