You are here: Home ›› ICL Community ›› Blog ›› A Ruckus Among Us: Helicopters vs. Wilderness

A Ruckus Among Us: Helicopters vs. Wilderness

Posted by John Robison at Feb 03, 2010 01:10 AM |
Filed under:

ICL steps up to protect the Frank Church Wilderness from illegal helicopter use.

A Ruckus Among Us: Helicopters vs. Wilderness

Landing soon in a wilderness near you?

Today, we joined seven other conservation groups in a lawsuit against the Forest Service to protect the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness from illegal mechanized intrusions.

Normally, helicopters are not allowed to land except in emergencies. But the Forest Service recently gave the Idaho Department of Fish and Game permission to use helicopters to collar wolves in the wilderness. 

Fish and Game has the right to monitor Idaho's wildlife, but methods need to be consistent with wilderness values. For example, the Nez Perce Tribe has collared over 30 wolves in the wilderness using traditional trapping methods

Almost everywhere else, folks can use ATVs instead of hiking boots and snowmobiles instead of snowshoes because those methods are faster and easier. But we decided the Frank Church is different, it's special, it's the last of what once was, and it's important to meet this wild country on its own terms. 

For these reasons, ICL helped pass the Central Idaho Wilderness Act in 1980, which is why we're stepping up to protect it today. 

This use of helicopters isn’t necessary, isn’t legal and violates the values that the Frank Church Wilderness was designed to preserve.


Document Actions

Cost Comparison

Posted by Steve Wieland at Feb 05, 2010 01:27 PM
I also wonder whether traditional trapping methods are more cost effective. I have no idea, but it seems that helicopters require a lot of overhead compared to traps on the ground.

Helicopter costs

Posted by John Robison at Feb 08, 2010 10:27 AM
Good question. Since Fish and Game is conducting aerial big game surveys anyway, using a helicopter is probably cheaper than ground based trapping (and certainly quicker). But when choosing management tools for wilderness work, the most appropriate methods aren't always the cheapest or the quickest (think about using a cross-cut saw instead of a chain saw). Even when you factor in the added cost and time, we think that traditional ground based trapping is still the most reasonable way to get the job done and still protect the wilderness experience for everyone.

powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and served with clean energy